Penguatan Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Kejaksaan Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sidang Perkara Nomor Nomor 28/Puu-Xxi/2023

Main Article Content

Pradita Ajeng Sekar Arum

Abstract

Corruption cases in Indonesia still really need attention considering that the consequences can be detrimental to the state and society. Handling the eradication of corruption is then carried out by several state institutions which are given direct authority by law, one of which is through the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Legal certainty of authority is very necessary to create harmony between government institutions and avoid overlapping authority. Furthermore, in writing this article, we used an approach method, namely an empirical method with descriptive analytical research specifications. The formulation of the problem raised in this article is regarding legal certainty in strengthening the prosecutor's office as an investigator in criminal acts of corruption. Furthermore, the purpose of this article is to analyze legal certainty or the legal standing of the authority of the prosecutor's office as an investigator in criminal acts of corruption. The authority of the Prosecutor's Office is contained in Article 30 paragraph (1) letter d of Law 5 of 1991 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia which was later declared invalid by Law 16 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Then in Article 26 of Law no. 19 of 2019 Second amendment to UU No. 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption Crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
ArumP. (2024). Penguatan Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Kejaksaan Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sidang Perkara Nomor Nomor 28/Puu-Xxi/2023. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(3), 1712 - 1719. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i3.7251
Section
Articles

References

Angga Aprilluan, Kewenangan Jaksa sebagai Penyidik Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Tindak Pidana Asalnya, 2017.
Hibnu Nugroho, Efektivitas Fungsi Koordinasi dan Supervisi dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 12 Nomor 3, 2013.
Irfani, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa, Jurnal Al’Adl, Volume 9 Nomor 3, 2017.
Muhammad Hatta. 2019. Kejahatan Luar Biasa (Extra Ordinary Crime). Lhoksuemawe: Unimal Press.
Sri Pujianti, Kewenangan Kejaksaan Lakukan Penyidikan Tipikor sebagai Perlawanan Terhadap Kejahatan Luar Biasa, Kewenangan Kejaksaan Lakukan Penyidikan Tipikor Sebagai Perlawanan Terhadap Kejahatan Luar Biasa | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (mkri.id) diakses pada tanggal 29 November 2023.
Stuart Ford, Crimes Against Humanity At The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia: Is A Connection With Armed Conflict Required? Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, January 2007.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Sidang Perkara Nomor 28/PUU-XII/2023.
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2019 Perubahan kedua UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi.